Friday, October 31, 2008
Thursday, October 30, 2008
On the Lighter Side
1. Where is you cell phone...here
2. Where is your significant other... school
3. Your hair color... contemplating
4. Your mother... help
5. Your father... goof
6. Your favorite thing... hugs
7. Your dream last night... Kazor!
8. Your dream goal... chef
9. Room you're in... office
10. Your hobby... blogging
11. Your fear... winter
12. Where do you want to be in 6 years...here
13. Where were you last night... couch
14. What you're not... rich
15. One of your wish-list items... boots
16. Where you grew up... Illinois
17. The last thing you ate...doritos
18. What are you wearing... casual
19. Your TV... off
20. Your pet... soon
21. Your computer... lifeline
22. Your mood... good
23. Missing someone... always
24. Your car... embarrassing
25. Something you"re not wearing...nailpolish
26. Favorite store... Trader Joe's
27. Your summer... travel
28. Love someone...lots
29. Your favorite color... green
30. Last time you laughed... today
31. Last time you cried... today
Friday, October 17, 2008
To all the Joe the Plumbers out there
I've been thinking a lot about you since the debate last Wednesday and ever since I saw you on Good Morning America. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeX3zfvIwAA) You seem like a very nice man, and I admired that you did not say who you were voting for and chose not become a McCain (or Obama maybe) spokesperson. You cleared things up a bit, too, and let the world know that, in fact, you do not make $250,000.00 a year. Your question to Obama at a rally was hypothetical, something along the lines of "If I were to start my own business and start making over that much, would I then have to pay more in taxes?" Fair enough.
What I've been thinking about most is your argument against having to pay more taxes. Your position, and that of many Republicans, is that you should not be penalized for being successful. Diane Sawyer asks if you feel the same about the very rich, those who make millions and can clearly afford to pay more in taxes. You said that these people, too, should not be penalized. I guess one of my problems is the word penalized. I mean, is paying taxes really a punishment? We pay taxes on a lot of things, and I never thought of it as a punishment. Annoying? Sure. Expensive? Sometimes. But punishment?
Everybody, or most everybody, pays taxes, right? It's just a necessary part of being an adult, right? So what would you suggest, Joe the Plumber, we do? Pay no taxes? That hardly seems doable. Should everybody pay the same amount? And what amount is that? What if we took the bulk amount of what the US takes in in taxes and divided it by the number of families in the United States and charged everyone that same amount? I wonder how that would go over? Probably pretty well, actually, since those with money would love it and those without money do not have a voice to say anything. They're always the losers, aren't they?
The way I see it, those with a lot of money should absolutely have to pay more in taxes. Certainly nobody should have to pay so much that they lose a business or go bankrupt, but is it fair that those making a ton of money are getting tax breaks while those in the middle/lower class are not? I just don't see how people that make three times or more in a year than most average families justify not wanting to pay more in taxes. Joe the Plumber said that he works hard, long days. Don't a lot of people work hard, long days and make barely enough to stay afloat? I keep hearing McCain talk about how proud he is of his supporters, how they are good, decent citizens - the salt of the earth! And many of them are. (Some of them are my close family!) But if you're really good and decent, do you complain about paying more in taxes if you know it's good for the country, takes the burden off those less fortunate, and you can easily afford it? That just seems wrong to me.
A family making $250,000.00 a year is doing pretty well, aren't they? They are going out to eat 2 times a week or more. They are taking family vacations. They go to Starbucks and don't blink an eye a their $5 latte. When the want something, they buy it. Sure, these are generalizations and not all these families live extravagant lifestyles, but they certainly sleep okay at night. (At least they did before the recent financial crisis.) So why should they make a big fuss at paying a bit more in taxes and helping out those families who do not have that peace of mind at night? Our tax dollars go to government funded programs meant to help people. Yes, some of these programs are flawed. And, yes, some of our tax dollars are misspent. But some aren't and our tax dollars go to programs that absolutely need to be funded. (Programs for education come to mind...)
I suppose the tax question represents a fundamental difference between Democrats and Republicans and goes along with the idea of smaller government. Smaller government is a GREAT idea...in theory. But the reality is that smaller government is just not enough sometimes. There are far too many people in the US and certainly far too many who are disenfranchised. We need good people in Washington working to do good things for EVERYBODY, not just those with money. Money = power. Those with it, have it. Those without it, have to fight hard for it.
Now, I'm not saying that Obama is a knight in shining armor who will swoop in and save the country. And I'm not saying that McCain is not a good man. And I'm certainly not naive enough to believe that the president has all that much power, either. But I do believe that Obama, as president, will do more than the other guy to bring this country together and stand up for those who have smaller voices. After all, helping those people is how Obama got his start, working with lower income families to organize and make their voices heard. Making sure these Americans do not have higher taxes, adding to their already heavy burden, is just one way to help.
Good luck climbing higher on the plumber rungs, Joe the Plumber. I do hope you become as successful as you'd like to be. And once you're there, I hope you remember those around you who have not been so fortunate.
Warm regards,
Michelle
P.S. Will wanted me to add that Warren Buffet, the world's second richest man, has said that he pays less in taxes now than he ever has before. Warren Buffet also supports Obama.
Thursday, October 9, 2008
Our Pumpkin-less Day at the Pumpkin Farm
The four above are from our walk in the McDonald's Headquarter's grounds. Do you see the crane in the last picture? Pretty cool.
Here's Ethan eating one of the last of the cookies we made.
I guess this face makes it all worth it, huh?
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Recipe for a Great Day
10. Enjoy.
Thursday, September 25, 2008
I'm Still Here!
Here are Chris and Laura during their first dance...pictures are dark, sorry!
Lisa and Brian really took advantage of a rare night out and danced with us a lot.
Will and I literally danced all night. My feet hurt, but we had a blast!
Me and my mom, who I was so grateful to for watching Ethan from 1pm on Friday through the wedding on Saturday. Ethan was such a good boy for her, so that's good.
Chris and Laura share another dance later in the night.
On the dance floor still! This is at our house the next day. We had Bill, Betsy, and Grandma Meuer (all 101 years of her!) over for dinner. It was a lot of fun.
Now it's back to real life, which is just fine with me. The weather continues to awe us all, getting into the 80's all week. Truth be told, though, I'm ready for some typical fall weather. I love brisk fall weather, as long as it's not too cold and the sun is still shining. I'm looking forward to walks and playtime at the park when the weather is not so warm.
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
Am I a sexist?
And I'm trying to be fair about it, I really am. As I told my mom, I'd like to think my feelings are bipartisan and that if a Obama had picked a Palinesque running mate I'd feel the same way. And I really think I would. The problem is, I would not be nearly as hard on a male candidate with an infant and four other children. Clearly, a male candidate would not get to spend as much time with those children just like a female. So why am I being so hard on Palin about it as a woman?
It's difficult to explain, I guess. Obviously, gender roles in our society play a huge part of my feelings. Women are the traditional caretakers of children, after all, and those stereotypes are hard to get over. But I also think my new role as mother is playing into my feelings. I see what I am doing as so important and wonder why Palin would give that up for such a time consuming job. Bear in mind I am certainly not saying that mothers should not work, but I cannot imagine working the hours Palin will as VP with an infant or other young children at home and being able to balance well. Women are capable of amazing things, no doubt, but let's be realistic. She is not going to take her baby (or other children) with her on trips to Georgia or the Middle East, is she? And her trying to be Supermom and Vice President just to prove she can do it (but I dont' think she, or anyone, can) seems very unfair to me. Her older daughter, the pregnant one, is already suffering with the media storm that has hit.
And I guess it makes me really angry that she's running on this conservative, family values ticket. What about taking a HUGE job with a special needs infant screams family values?
And as long as I'm ranting, why is it that every conservative Republican is using her Downs Syndrome baby to say how wonderful Palin is because she chose not to abort her child? Come on! Just because you're pro-choice doesn't mean you would always choose abortion! Pro-choice does not equal pro-abortion, and to insinuate that all or most pro-choicers would have chosen to abort a child with DS is just plain ridiculous...and insulting.
I don't love that I feel this way. I know it's a sexist opinion, and I really hope (if elected - grrrr) she proves me wrong.
Off to watch her speech...